'Apply to Oldest' – A Hit or Miss?
'Apply to Oldest' – A Hit or Miss?
Welcome to the dynamic world of Microsoft
Dynamics 365 Business Central! It's an exciting journey, navigating the
intricacies of a new financial system, especially when it comes to managing
multiple sets of books with unique requirements.
The
Challenge of Journal Entries Over Invoices
Our community members often share their
experiences and today, we address a common scenario: What do you do when your
business model relies on journal entries rather than invoicing, and you face
inconsistencies with the 'Apply to Oldest' feature affecting your aging
reports?
You're batching monthly levies, and your
customers are set to 'Apply to Oldest', but sometimes it doesn't catch the
oldest entry. When aging accuracy is paramount for automated payment reminders,
this can be more than just a nuisance.
Here's a case in point:
Entry number 158112 was applied when,
ideally, it should have been entry number 157136, leading to discrepancies in
the aging report. Payment terms set to CD (Current Date) should make the due
date the same as the posting date, yet the issue persists.
The
Solution
1. Keep the Cut Off Date Field Open: When
using 'Apply to Oldest', it's crucial to leave the cut off date field open in
Business Central. This allows the system to pull in all due invoices. Setting a
cut off date may cause Business Central to overlook older invoices, which would
not be ideal for your needs.
2. Consider Manual Application: Although it
may seem counterintuitive in an automated environment, manual application
grants you more control over which entries to apply. This ensures that each
entry is correctly attributed, preserving the integrity of your aging reports.
The goal is clear: achieve accurate aging
reports and a seamless automated reconciliation process. By ensuring 'Apply to
Oldest' functions correctly without a cut off date, or opting for a manual
approach, you can maintain a reliable financial structure across multiple
companies.
Comments
Post a Comment